Technology-DRAFT
First-In-Class Targets for Immuno-Inflammatory Diseases
We are advancing first-in-class therapies for Medical Dermatology and Respiratory diseases. Our clinical-stage drugs target critical points in inflammatory and innate immune response pathways, such as CXCL10 and TLR4. Our goal is to transform the lives of patients suffering from acute and chronic diseases.
CXCL10
C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 10 plays an important role in both the innate and adaptive immune responses in patients with vitiligo
TLR4
Toll-like Receptor 4 is key receptor on which both infectious and noninfectious stimuli converge to induce a proinflammatory response
sPLA2
The Secretory Phospholipase A2 enzyme family plays a key role in initiating inflammation associated with many diseases
EB06- Anti-CXCL10 Antibody Candidate for Vitiligo
Vitiligo – Millions Affected Globally
Diagnosed with Vitiligo
Mean Age of Onset
Approved Systemic Treatments
A Life-Altering Disease
2% of the world’s population
- Chronic, progressive and must be managed for decades
- Deep emotional impact – especially children & teens
- Numerous comorbidities
Significant unmet medical need
- No systematic drugs approved by FDA to re-pigment skin
- Few effective therapies
- Millions do not seek treatment
Prominent role of CXCL10
-
CXCL10 is elevated in vitiligo patients
- Therapeutically targeting this chemokine has been substantiated in third-party preclinical studies
Novel Mechanism
A fully human monoclonal antibody, EB06 has been shown to trap CXCL10 in the circulatory system and render it biologically inactive.
Dual Action
EB06 blocks CXCL10 from binding to its receptors, CXCR3A and CXCR3B, which mediates different signaling pathways important to disease progression and maintenance.
No Daily Dosing
EB06 is being developed as a more effective and conventient treatment, with an improved safety profile compared to current treatments
Target Product Profile – EB06 anti-CXCL10 biologic drug candidate
Addressing Unmet Medical Needs in Vitiligo
Topical JAK Inhibitors
- Treats lesional skin
- Treats non-lesional skin
- Viable for patients with >10% BSA
- No expected safety precaution (“Black Box”)
- No Daily Dosing
Oral JAK Inhibitors
- Treats lesional skin
- Treats non-lesional skin
- Viable for patients with >10% BSA
- No expected safety precaution (“Black Box”)
- No Daily Dosing
Topical BET Inhibitors
- Treats lesional skin
- Treats non-lesional skin
- Viable for patients with >10% BSA
- No expected safety precaution (“Black Box”)
- No Daily Dosing
Biologics
- Treats lesional skin
- Treats non-lesional skin
- Viable for patients with >10% BSA
- No expected safety precaution (“Black Box”)
- No Daily Dosing
BSA = Body Surface Area
EB01- A Topical Daniluromer Candidate for Allergic Contact Dermatitis
ACD – The Leading Occupational Health Issue Related to Dermatology
Known Contact Allergens
%
Unable to Identify Allergen
No Known Labelled Drugs
First-in-Class Anti-Inflammatory
EB01 (daniluromer), an sPLA2 inhibitor, is designed to inhibit the inflammatory process at its inception.
Alternative to Steroids
Broad Potential Opportunities
Potential for treating a diverse range of inflammatory/allergic conditions.
1.0% EB01 Met Primary with Statistical Significance
Phase 2B – Daniluromer Results
For the treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe allergic contact dermatitis
Total CDSI Score*
Mean Percent Improvement from Baseline
Efficacy
- 1.0% EB01-treated patients demonstrated a relative improvement of >50% (CDSI) and >80% (ISGA) over placebo/vehicle
Response at 15 Days (CDSI)
- 44% for 1.0% EB01 vs. 29% for placebo; p=0.05
Response at Follow Up (CDSI)
- 64% for 1.0% EB01 vs. 44% for placebo; p=0.04
Lowest Efficacious Dose
- 1.0% EB01 was identified as the lowest efficacious dose over 2.0% and 0.2%
Safety
- No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported across all doses
*Intention to Treat (ITT) population; statistical analysis based on last observation carried forward (LOCF). Placebo (n=84); 1.0% EB01 Cream (n=19). Contact Dermatitis Severity Index (CDSI) at Day 29. Success on the Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA) is defined as a 2-point reduction and score indicating clear/almost-clear skin.
EB05 (paridiprubart) – An Antibody Candidate for Inflammation and Fibrosis
First in Class mAb
Our most advanced Respiratory drug candidate is EB05 (paridiprubart), an anti-TLR4 monoclonal antibody developed for acute and chronic disease indications that involve dysregulated innate immunity responses.
Well Documented Mechanism of Action
TLR4 is one of the most studied innate immune receptors. It mediates of both inflammation and fibrosis.
EB05 binds with a high affinity and blocks the dimerization of TLR4 and its activity.
Preclinical and Clinical Evidence
Hundreds dosed in multiple preclinical and clinical studies.
Edesa’s Phase 2 study was stopped early due to a strong survival signal in critically ill patients.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
A Leading Cause of ICU Admissions Globally
Annual Cases Globally
%
ICU Mortality Rate
$ Cost Per Patient (Average U.S.)
Multiple Causes
Aging Population
Changing demographics increase the risk of developing ARDS. There’s an increasing long-term need for effective ARDS therapeutics.
Co-morbidities and Risk Factors
EB05 (Paridiprubart) Decreases Mortality by 84% in Critically Severe Patients
Phase 2 Results
Statistically Significant Mortality Trend in Critical Patients
28-Day Mortality Rate by Treatment Group*
n=33; p=0.04
“Achieving statistical significance in the most difficult-to-treat patients has increased our excitement and belief that Paridiprubart could become a standard-of-care treatment option.”
Critically ill patient population*
- 28-day death rate of 7.7% (1/13) in the EB05 (Paridiprubart) arm vs. 40.0% (8/20) in the placebo arm
- 84% reduction in the risk of dying (HR: 6.12 placebo vs. EB05 (Paridiprubart); 95% CI: 0.77-49.06; p=0.088).
- All patients received Standard of Care (SOC): ~85% received dexamethasone (or other steroids); >40% received both tocilizumab and a steroid; well balanced
Favorable Safety Profile
- Paridiprubart, an anti-TLR4 antibody candidate, has been evaluated in multiple clinical studies (with 600+ subjects in total)
*World Health Organization’s Covid-19 Severity Scale Level 7 critically severe patients, receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), invasive mechanical ventilation plus organ support, or both. ITT= Intend to Treat (i.e., no randomized subjects were excluded).
Additional Opportunities for Paridriprubart in Pulmonary Fibrosis
Current Treatments May Only Slow Disease Progression
Prevalence per 100k
Billion Dollars (Annual Cost U.S.)
$ Cost Per Patient (Average U.S.)
Third Party PreClinical Research Highlights Prominent Role of TLR4 in Fibrosis
Animal models display attenuated fibrosis
- Knockouts of TLR4 result in attenuated fibrosis in mice
Anti-TLR4 Reduced Fibrosis
- TLR4 antagonist reduced fibrosis in mouse model in a dose-dependent manner
Reversed Fibrosis
- Targeting TLR4 leads to a reversal of fibrosis in skin in mouse model
Predict
- TLR4 agonists are predictors of disease progression and severity
Further Reading
El-Domyati et al., 2022: Demonstrated that the chemokine CXCL10 was elevated in both vitiligo patient skin and serum.
Rashighi et al., 2014: In a mouse model of vitiligo, neutralization of CXCL10 in mice with established, widespread depigmentation induced reversal of disease.
Gharib et al., 2021: Serum CXCL10 levels are significantly increased in vitiligo patients compared to controls, suggesting that CXCL10 may play a role in the pathogenesis of vitiligo
Jiang et al., 2005: TLRs are known to be involved in exaggerated immune responses, with TLR4 shown to induce inflammatory responses that can lead to acute lung injury (ALI) and ARDS
Imai et al., 2008: This study looked at the role of TLR4 in ALI. Mice deficient in TLR4 were resistant to acid-induced ALI and while H5N1 influenza rapidly induced ALI in wild-type mice, TLR4 deficient mice were resistant to H5N1-induced ALI, suggesting a causative role for TLR4 in
Shirey et al., 2016: In this study, an anti-TLR4 antibody protected mice from lethal influenza
Perrin-Cocon et al., 2017: A novel small molecule TLR4 antagonist (FP7) was tested in an in vivo mouse model of influenza. FP7 blocked TLR4 stimulation and protected mice from influenza-induced lethality and reduced inflammatory cytokine expression and
Zhou et al., 2018: An anti-TLR4 monoclonal antibody was studied in a rat model of ARDS. The rats treated with the anti-TLR4 antibody showed lower respiratory frequency, lung permeability, lung edema, inflammatory infiltration, and tumor necrosis factor and interleukin expression levels in lungs along with lower TLR4, TLR9, MyD88, and nuclear factor expression in macrophages.
Domitrovic 2018: TLR4 monoclonal antibodies were evaluated both in vitro and in a rat model of ARDS. Stimulating macrophages with TNF-alpha along with anti-TLR4 antibody eliminated the upregulation and secretion of cytokines. Pre-treating rats with anti-TLR4 antibody prior to ventilation.
Lee et al., 2009: CXCL10 plays a significant role in leukocyte recruitment to inflamed tissues, and because of this it can lead to excessive inflammation and tissue damage. Patients who suffer from ARDS are known to exhibit unusually high levels of CXCL10.
Wang et al., 2013: This study showed that patients suffering from ARDS caused by H1N1 infection had significantly elevated levels of CXCL10 in their serum compared to a control group. An anti-CXCL10 monoclonal antibody increased survival time, reduced lung edema, and significantly decreased ALI in a mouse model of H1N1 infection.
Ichikawa et al., 2013: In this study, ARDS was induced in mice by both non-viral and viral means. Mice deficient in CXCL10 or CXCR3 had improved severity and survival of both viral and non-viral ARDS.
Lang et al., 2017: This study explored the role of CXCL10 in a rat model of LPS-induced ARDS. Expression of CXCL10 and CXCR3 increased after LPS-induction. An anti-CXCL10 antibody decreased the severity of ARDS.